The big news in the US is how the Republicans leading the House of Representatives are refusing to accept a budget that doesn't cut spending sufficiently, whereas Obama and the Democrats are portraying it as some great social mission to hit abortion and the like.
The truth is that the Republicans are doing what they were elected to do - to cut the deficit.
The proposed cuts are less than 4% of the budget deficit (2% of the total budget) according to Reason Magazine.
Consider that the UK government is seeking to abolish its structural deficit (deficit not attributed to reduced tax revenue and higher welfare spending because of recession) within five years. 4% needs to be closer to 20% to make a difference, and Obama and the Democrats wont even accept 4%.
The Cato Institute has a more ambitious plan that should be the least that is adopted, as this would abolish the budget deficit and set a path to start rolling back the US national debt, as well as lowering taxes.
The question I wonder is why anyone on the left thinks they can evade reality by building debt mountains for future generations to confront - or more importantly, why they think this is moral? Do they think "if only we could confiscate the wealth of the rich" or are they so stupid to think they can have their heads in the sand? If they "don't know any better" or are "just guessing" then it isn't good enough. If they DO want to confiscate wealth, then just admit it, and show themselves up to be the violent crooks they want to be. The same crooks that didn't want banks to collapse, didn't want motor manufacturers to collapse, didn't want ANY businesses to collapse, so used other people's money to pay for it.