Sunday, September 18, 2011
Time for Assange's defenders to apologise
You've been backing an evil, self-aggrandising cunt.
Time for Keith Locke to resign, and for the Green Party to apologise, for their sycophantic embrace of this vile little man.
Time for the vapid conspiracy theory making tabloid scatologist Bomber Bradbury to apologise, and the smug Idiot Savant to do so as well.
Julian Assange had his moment in the sun about a year or so ago, when he was heralded as a hero by his publishing of stolen US diplomatic communications.
Of course Assange has an agenda, I made that point late last year. It is avowedly contrary to that of US and Western foreign policy, so like the vacuous kneejerk activists as they are, the hard left feted him as a "freedom fighter". He fitted their world view beautifully. He was fighting the power, he was showing up how arrogant the US is, about its plans around the world, about its private meetings with diplomats, politicians and businesspeople. Good old Julian, fuck the USA right?
Well I said a few weeks ago that he has published the names of anti-government activists in Iran and China, and informants from the Taliban in Afghanistan.
Now it looks a lot worse. Nick Cohen in the Observer has written further about how vile Assange really is. He talks of the David Leigh/Luke Harding book Wikileaks with this story.
"A reporter worried that Assange would risk killing Afghans who had co-operated with American forces if he put US secrets online without taking the basic precaution of removing their names. "Well, they're informants," Assange replied. "So, if they get killed, they've got it coming to them. They deserve it." A silence fell on the table as the reporters realised that the man the gullible hailed as the pioneer of a new age of transparency was willing to hand death lists to psychopaths."
See for Assange, members of the TALIBAN are more moral than people who oppose them and support the US in opposing them. Think about how much blind hatred is behind that view of his, how the worshippers of the dark ages, of totalitarian terror, of misogynistic tyranny are better than their opponents.
Then there is Assange's relationship with Israel Shamir, a friend of the Belarus dictatorship:
"On 19 December 2010, the Belarus-Telegraf, a state newspaper, said that WikiLeaks had allowed the dictatorship to identify the "organisers, instigators and rioters, including foreign ones" who had protested against rigged elections."
Nice that, of course this shouldn't surprise you. Israel Shamir (not his real name) was appointed as the Wikileaks Russian/Eastern European representative. Shamir collaborated with the Lukashenko dictatorship in Belarus - Europe's last dictatorship, one that is little different from the USSR. Shamir is anti-semitic, moving among such groups in eastern Europe. Nice touch, means Israel can be so much easier to attack when you ask if you can get everything the State Department has "on the Jews".
Cohen says it goes further, as Wikileaks endangered opposition journalists in Ethiopia:
"Argaw Ashine fled the country last week after WikiLeaks revealed that the reporter had spoken to an official from the American embassy in Addis Ababa about the regime's plans to intimidate the independent press. WikiLeaks also revealed that a government official told Arshine about the planned assault on opposition journalists. Thus Assange and his colleagues not only endangered the journalist. They tipped off the cops that he had a source in the state apparatus."
Freedom fighters? No. Assange is uninterested in political freedom. It's far from clear that he even understands it. He is a the small town boy desperate for attention.
Cohen demands that his supporters be confronted and held to account:
"First, there needs to be relentless pressure on the socialist socialites and haggard soixante-huitards who cheered Assange on. Bianca Jagger, Jemima Khan, John Pilger, Ken Loach and their like are fond of the egotistical slogan "not in my name." They are well-heeled and well-padded men and women who know no fear in their lives. Yet they are happy to let their names be used by Assange as he brings fear into the lives of others."
Some are empty heads, others are typical left wing no thinkers. However, it's hard to beat Bomber for the utterings of hyperbolic vacuity:
"Assange and wikileaks will be seen as a threat that needs utter annihilation because he disrupts the balance of power in a way no person ever has".
Bomber's an idiot, but Assange is a vile evil little prick who revels in his celebrity status, whose kiddi-socialism has gained him lots of sycophantic followers with similar levels of adolescent simplicity in their beliefs. The types that attack the West, while living in it, because they like to be rebels, they want to believe that politicians don't tell you everything, that there are grand conspiracies between business, government and media to make sure you don't know the truth. They ignore real dictatorships because that's not counter-establishment enough, after all the US, Europe and other Western countries already oppose Syria, Belarus, North Korea and the Taliban.
I hope Wikileaks goes under, I hope Assange loses it all and has to get a real job, and I hope his vapid sycophants apologise for supporting this monster. Then I hope they give donations to Reporters Without Borders to atone for their stupidity, and start supporting people who do support freedom.