tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post1357380600982759985..comments2024-03-09T18:57:10.942+13:00Comments on Liberty Scott: Why the Family Party is just so wrongLibertyscotthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12741049550997300680noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post-32887949347295175522008-09-07T10:54:00.000+12:002008-09-07T10:54:00.000+12:00What LS said Zen....I love it when Im spared all t...What LS said Zen....<BR/><BR/><BR/>I love it when Im spared all that typing! ;-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post-45268428669226908982008-09-07T03:25:00.000+12:002008-09-07T03:25:00.000+12:00Good to have heated argument. Now to take points o...Good to have heated argument. Now to take points one by one:<BR/><BR/>Zen's first post: Situation 4 is the tort of nuisance, Situation 5 is the initiation of force, so neither apply. The other 3 should be dealt with by other individuals ignoring or expressing disapproval. Frankly if 2 people want to shag in public that's their issue, but I'll tell them to go somewhere else. If they were in a Libertyscotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12741049550997300680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post-44681781245662641232008-09-06T18:19:00.000+12:002008-09-06T18:19:00.000+12:00Yeah, yeah. Like you never make flamboyant statem...Yeah, yeah. Like you never make flamboyant statements James. <BR/><BR/>I'm still interested in your response to my questions. Come on, make an effort.ZenTigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07888629207437612884noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post-72830507667021146642008-09-06T16:23:00.000+12:002008-09-06T16:23:00.000+12:00. ..."You still can't kill slaves on private prope.... ..."You still can't kill slaves on private property, no matter how much they consent."<BR/><BR/><BR/>Oh dear....you really said that?<BR/><BR/><BR/>sighAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post-38314780533417875462008-09-06T16:18:00.000+12:002008-09-06T16:18:00.000+12:00I hate "kissing" couples gay or straight - especia...I hate "kissing" couples gay or straight - especially at sporting or musical events. People are there to watch the event, not to be kissing each other. <BR/><BR/>It's a distraction and it's often the ugliest damn couple in the arena that want to smooch.<BR/><BR/>Keep your ass at home if your priority is to be kissing on someone. Watch the game or whatever on tv. Stadiums are guilty by pushing Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post-18194206089861012282008-09-06T11:45:00.000+12:002008-09-06T11:45:00.000+12:00Pretend the government is a corporation that owns ...Pretend the government is a corporation that owns the currently public property James, and see where that gets you.<BR/><BR/>Your opinion that the public must put up with anything that happens in public because it is public property still does not hold. Read my previous comment for a reason.<BR/><BR/><EM>Public ownership and genuine individual rights are in conflict.</EM><BR/><BR/>No, because ZenTigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07888629207437612884noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post-11413790429365632552008-09-06T11:12:00.000+12:002008-09-06T11:12:00.000+12:00If you have public ownership Zen then thems the br...If you have public ownership Zen then thems the braeks you must endure....support private property rights and be at peace. ;-)<BR/><BR/>Public ownership and genuine individual rights are in conflict....a Libertarian would know that...you seem unarmed however...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post-85944748621755519242008-09-05T22:28:00.000+12:002008-09-05T22:28:00.000+12:00Public ownership implies shared decisions James; n...Public ownership implies shared decisions James; not "I'm doing anything I want and stuff everyone else".<BR/><BR/>The issue here is not the girl on girl action per se, but that the radio station was promoting this in a public place. Why couldn't they hire a private venue? What happens when they promote simulated rape just to get their ratings up? Again, this isn't about freedom, this is aboutZenTigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07888629207437612884noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post-84922471676621284132008-09-05T20:04:00.000+12:002008-09-05T20:04:00.000+12:00Well Zen if you want to keep "public ownership" th...Well Zen if you want to keep "public ownership" then be prepared top suck it up every now and then....cos horror....these people are as 'public" as you are..Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post-40666469188972958702008-09-05T16:27:00.000+12:002008-09-05T16:27:00.000+12:00The cry of the liberal was "what goes in in the be...The cry of the liberal was "what goes in in the bedrooms is no concern of ours"<BR/><BR/>Now, it is "what goes on in public doesn't stop people from looking away".<BR/><BR/>I understand your point LibertyScott, but I'm wondering if you have ANY limits on non-violent action in public, like:<BR/><BR/>1. Sex <BR/>2. Role play bondage sessions<BR/>3. Simulated Rape<BR/>4. Singing Loudly at 2am.<BR/>5ZenTigerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07888629207437612884noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15768887.post-77725012840206349842008-09-05T11:51:00.000+12:002008-09-05T11:51:00.000+12:00Urgh. Now imagine the outcry if it had been boy on...Urgh. Now imagine the outcry if it had been boy on boy action!Stephaniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05680274679737065263noreply@blogger.com