National 45.5% 41 electorate seats 18 list seats - 59
Labour 33.8% 21 electorate seats 22 list seats - 43
Greens 6.4% 8 list seats
ACT 3.7% 1 electorate and 4 list seats - 5
Maori 2.2% 5 electorate seats
Progressive 0.9% 1 electorate seats
United Future 0.9% 1 electorate seat
Outside Parliament
NZ First 4.2%
Kiwi Party 0.56% (clearly the Christian part of United Future was disenchanted)
Bill and Ben Party 0.51% (yep, people who don't give a fuck)
ALCP 0.36% (ALCP picked up votes from the Greens, but will go to sleep - again)
Pacific Party 0.33% (Philip Field couldn't get much support beyond South Auckland)
Family Party 0.33% (Destiny brand gone, the Christian vote clearly split three ways)
Alliance 0.08% (held their own despite the leftwing competition)
Democrats 0.05% (held their own as well)
Libertarianz 0.05% (up 13%)
Workers Party 0.04% (Communist rump)
RAM and Republic of New Zealand Party - can't even get votes from all their members!
Blogging on liberty, capitalism, reason, international affairs and foreign policy, from a distinctly libertarian and objectivist perspective
09 November 2008
08 November 2008
John Key the victor - PM elect
Obama? "They voted for change". New National led government. Thanks supporters. Voted for safer, more prosperous and more ambitious New Zealand. Inspired as a kid who rode bike from his state house past those of wealthier kids (pretty good stuff). NZ has so much more potential. Collective success rests on the success of individuals. His government values individual achievement. Thanks Clark, she gave him gracious comments on her concession. Spoke to Rodney Hide, Peter Dunne (didn't mention Maori Party), they are willing to lend support to a new government. Spoke to Tariana Turia, willingness to engage in dialogue with Maori Party next week.
So it DOES look like National/ACT/United Future, but he wont be wanting to upset the Maori Party.
Will National do what Labour did?
Labour has always been thought to go with the Greens, and in 2005, the Maori Party.
It went with United Future in 2002, and NZ First and United Future in 2005.
National DOES have a choice this time:
- ACT
- Maori Party
Peter Dunne is an add on, he's unnecessary.
National might go with the Maori Party to broaden its base, after all it is, inherently, a conservative party. ACTivists and Rodney Hide might pause till they hear and see what John Key does.
It went with United Future in 2002, and NZ First and United Future in 2005.
National DOES have a choice this time:
- ACT
- Maori Party
Peter Dunne is an add on, he's unnecessary.
National might go with the Maori Party to broaden its base, after all it is, inherently, a conservative party. ACTivists and Rodney Hide might pause till they hear and see what John Key does.
ACT's MPs
Rodney Hide (Epsom is his through and through)
Heather Roy
Sir Roger Douglas
John Boscawen - Freedom of Speech Trust founder
David Garrett - Mr Sensible Sentencing Trust
ACT should be able to demand two Ministers from that, but will National want it?
Heather Roy
Sir Roger Douglas
John Boscawen - Freedom of Speech Trust founder
David Garrett - Mr Sensible Sentencing Trust
ACT should be able to demand two Ministers from that, but will National want it?
Clark keeps the headline
As RNZ says, this is Clark grabbing the headlines tomorrow.
It wasn't a McCain concession, it was a campaigning concession.
One third new MPs and that caucus has to find a new leader. Goff, Cullen or silent T?
It wasn't a McCain concession, it was a campaigning concession.
One third new MPs and that caucus has to find a new leader. Goff, Cullen or silent T?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)