The Dominion Post reports on the sort of people who will live off the back of others, who gain great pleasure in destroying what others produce - they aren't a big focus of the criminal justice system - and the welfare system will happily pay them to live, and breed.
It's a very simple policy to stop paying criminals to live and breed. Those convicted of such an offence should be denied any claim on the welfare state, and required to pay full compensation for the damage.
While the compulsory welfare state remains, why should those who wantonly destroy what others create, get the proceeds of it all?
What a leap forward it would be if National just promised to deny welfare benefits to those convicted of property offences, for at least ten years.
What's a bet Sue Bradford would say those who did this are "disadvantaged" (as if the intellectually disabled users of this IHC workshop are not), and deserve more of your money to keep them from being so destructive.
It's a very simple policy to stop paying criminals to live and breed. Those convicted of such an offence should be denied any claim on the welfare state, and required to pay full compensation for the damage.
While the compulsory welfare state remains, why should those who wantonly destroy what others create, get the proceeds of it all?
What a leap forward it would be if National just promised to deny welfare benefits to those convicted of property offences, for at least ten years.
What's a bet Sue Bradford would say those who did this are "disadvantaged" (as if the intellectually disabled users of this IHC workshop are not), and deserve more of your money to keep them from being so destructive.
No comments:
Post a Comment