1. Everytime someone mentions it, I feel ill. I find him a repulsive little man, but...
2. it is absolutely irrelevant whether he or any other MP is:
a) an ascetic;
b) wanks furiously to memorable earlier life experiences;
c) gay, bisexual, lesbian, heterosexual;
d) likes being spanked or spanking or whipping or bondage or retifism or klismaphilia or urolagnia or coprophilia (if you don't know don't ask and certainly don't look it up on your work PC);
e) buys used underwear or socks off the internet from university students;
f) has occasional conventional sex with a life partner;
g) gets buggered by a strap on worn by a prostitute.
^
I don't give a damn. Wishart's muckraking is not about policy, not about the law, but about being a judgmental little prick about what consenting adults do in their own time. Ian Wishart's motives I believe are twofold:
^
1. Sex sells. There is a prurient interest in "phwoar what did the pervy MP do". However Investigate isn't the Sun.
2. Catering for the finger pointing Christian conservatives. The type that would be outraged to know the MPs who are gay but in the closet, or who would punish their kids if they caught them masturbating.
^
In short, the people who have their own perversions, of voyeurism and in being fascinated in what other adults do (and either wanting to secretly join in, or to burn them at the stake).
^
These people are far more disconcerting than most of the pervs who have found this post through googling some of the words listed above.
^
There are reasons to attack Benson-Pope - my simple one is that he is a prick, based on personal experience.
4 comments:
I am sick of Wishart's political smearing. Oh, and Hagar's. Wishart and Hager are one and the same. They are muckrakers that use the truth only when a lie isn't available. And even then they usually just say nothing rather than use the truth.
Maybe Wishart will follow on from Benson-Pope with some explosive/groundbreaking/shocking and exclusive stories on the dodgy antics of the many dodgy evangalical Churches and Christians around the world, particularly in the U.S.
Some juicy stories there.
so when panty slut boy clearly gets his kicks out of caning teenage students of his you have no problem?
this is not about consenting adults.
From police files via investigate
“When it was my turn,” continues the former student who'd refused to jump the vault, “I was brought into the hall. I was bent over and caned once over my trousers by Benson-Pope. I pleaded not to be caned again but was struck once more with the cane.
“I remember Benson-Pope laughing while he caned me, and that's what got me the most. When I got home I realized I had blood on my bum.”
So when Benson-Pope accused Investigate of publishing ridiculous nonsense, he omitted to tell Close Up that the allegations actually came from within the official police file.
Well clearly I do have a problem when he acts non-consensually. However, it is one thing to focus upon the questionable activities acting as a teacher, and another when he is with consenting adults. Wishart's "expose" of the latter invades the privacy of other people, and is relevant only if it is mentioned that he also liked it in private with adults, it supports allegations about his behaviour with students, but nothing more.
Wishart himself gets off with revealing how "naughty" Benson-Pope is with adults, and we all known Wishart is not exactly tolerant of all adult consensual sexual behaviour.
Post a Comment